Sonntag, 26. Februar 2012

Economics: Productivity and Technology

Not all profit from the fruits of innovation equally


On February 23rd, 2012, BCA Research published a piece of economic research about the general economic outlook with special focus on productivity and technological innovation. For those guys who love it short: Yes, we are living in difficult times with bad fiscal outlook and empoverished and angry consumers,  but the ongoing technological progress in various areas will bring some economic gains (don't ask for whom, that's complicated).

For complicated guys like me the complicated explanation:
"Productivity is the single most important economic force when it comes to growth and prosperity". And "productivity gains depend more on improved business practices and cost-saving innovations" (-> read IT). But IT spending has slowed down: in the 90s it was growing 18% against 5% growth in the last decade.
Let's have a look at IT stocks:

As you can see, aggregated earnings of the IT sector is higher relative to other non-financial sectors (we want to neglect banks because of the bias of the financial bubble). Although we have to admit that IT earnings are also biased due to Apples astronomical profits, which cannot continue forever (as an analogy remember the "grain on the chessboard" tale). Nevertheless, IT stocks are attractively valued  historically:
I guess we all know the story of the still indebted consumers in the US and the miserable fiscal situation of almost all developed countries, which can spoil the party. Especially, in light of the consequences of demographics in many countries (ageing population). Another serious threat to growth is not often discussed: Middleclass with less money to spend in the US...
Populist politics will hurt growth, should this economically and politically unsustainable situation persist. My guess is, that it will be much less messy if dealt with early...

Montag, 13. Februar 2012

Guru Buffet's Upcoming Shareholder letter


Fortune published on February 9th, 20112 an adapted version of his upcoming annual shareholder letter of my guru Warren Buffet. I think following points are worth considering:

  • Risk: not the fluctuation of market value as Wall Street sees it, but loss of purchasing power is the real risk.
  • Thus, cash is risky since you need today $7 to buy what was worth $1 back in 1965.
  • U.S. Treasury bills paying 5.7% interest wouldn't get you anywhere since you need to pay taxes and have to offset inflation. You barely maintain your purchasing power.
  • Although gold has increased in value he is not in favor of gold: Imagine you could choose between pile A consisting of all gold holdings today (a cube of with each side 68 feet), which does not generate any earnings, crop or anything or pile B the equivalent in all US farmland and 16 Exxon Mobils (world's most profitable company) and $1 trillion spare cash. Buffet would clearly go for pile B.
 Buffet shows following graph illustrating the points above:
Moreover, he adds, that when everybody is shouting "cash is king" go for stocks like Exxon Mobil, Coca Cola and IBM, all first class businesses.
Buffet outs him self as a contrarian by stating: "We heard "cash is king" in late 2008, just when cash should have been deployed rather than held. Similarly, we heard "cash is trash" in the early 1980s just when fixed-dollar investments were at their most attractive level in memory. On those occasions, investors who required a supportive crowd paid dearly for that comfort."

Freitag, 10. Februar 2012

Eurocrisis: Angie's Private Plan

 
Today's FT sports an interesting analysis regarding chancellor Merkel's politics to solve the Eurocrisis by Quentin Peel (p. 7 of the print edition). He states that Mrs Merkel has developed private plan since July 2011:
  • Member states must cede (some) power step by step to Europe
  • Binding budgetary rules: ceilings for borrowing and budget, spending priorities to ensure growth and competitiveness, coordination of taxes, probably jointly guaranteed eurobonds.
  • Direct election of the Commission president, to overcome the disconnection between national politics and the European parliament
  • Since she will face substantial resistance domestically and abroad (also by Germany's main ally France), she will move cautiously and only unveil the plan step by step
Will it work?